The following document was NOT written as a post for Substack, but as a reference document for a church discussion. There are lots of formatting issues, which I will work on as I have time, but I thought it was worth publishing now for reference.
The Immediate Context
As someone trained in linguistics, my first rule of exegesis when it comes to the definition of words is: look for the definition in the context first; especially the immediate context.
1Co 14:34 Let your women keep silence G4601 in the churches: for it is not G3756 permitted G2010 unto them to speak; G2980 but they are commanded to be under obedience, G5293 as also saith the law.
The immediate context of the word ‘silence in the churches’ is ‘for it is not permitted unto them to speak’. Thus the kind of ‘silence’ we are talking about here is the kind of silence one observes when one is not permitted to speak.
This leads to the immediate question, what does it mean to ‘speak’? Again we look to the immediate context. In this case the part of the chapter immediately prior:
1Co 14:1
Follow after charity, and desire spiritual gifts, but rather that ye may prophesy.
1Co 14:2
For
he that speaketh G2980 in an unknown tongue G1100
speaketh G2980 not unto men, but unto God: for no man understandeth G191 him; howbeit in the spirit
he speaketh G2980 mysteries.
1Co 14:3
But he that prophesieth
speaketh G2980 unto men to edification, and exhortation, and comfort.
1Co 14:4
He that speaketh G2980 in an unknown tongue edifieth himself; but he that prophesieth edifieth the church.
1Co 14:5
I( would that
ye all spake G2980 with tongues, but rather that ye prophesied: for greater is he that prophesieth than
he that speaketh G2980 with tongues, except he interpret, that the church may receive edifying.
1Co 14:6
( G1161 ) Now, brethren, if
I come unto you speaking G2980 with tongues, what shall I profit you, except
I shall speak G2980 to you either by revelation, or by knowledge, or by prophesying, or by doctrine?
1Co 14:7
And even things without life giving sound, whether pipe or harp, except they give a distinction in the sounds, how shall it be known what is piped or harped?
1Co 14:8
For if the trumpet give an uncertain sound, G5456 who shall prepare himself to the battle?
1Co 14:9
So likewise ye, except ye utter by the tongue words easy to be understood, G2154 how shall it be known
what is spoken? G2980 for
ye shall speak G2071 G2980 into the air.
1Co 14:10
There are, it may be, so many kinds of voices in the world, and none of them is without signification.
1Co 14:11
Therefore if I know not the meaning of the voice, I shall be unto
him that speaketh G2980 a barbarian, and
he that speaketh G2980 shall be a barbarian unto me.
1Co 14:12 Even so ye, forasmuch as ye are zealous of spiritual gifts, seek that ye may excel to the edifying of the church.
1Co 14:13 Wherefore let
him that speaketh G2980 in an unknown tongue pray that he may interpret.
1Co 14:14
For if I pray in an unknown tongue, my spirit prayeth, but my understanding is unfruitful.
1Co 14:15
What is it then? I will pray with the spirit, and I will pray with the understanding also: I will sing with the spirit, and I will sing with the understanding also.
1Co 14:16
Else when thou shalt bless with the spirit, how shall he that occupieth the G3588 room of the unlearned say Amen at thy giving of thanks, seeing he understandeth not what thou sayest?
1Co 14:17
For thou verily givest thanks well, but the other is not edified.
1Co 14:18
I thank my God,
I speak G2980 with tongues more than ye all:
1Co 14:19
Yet in the church
I had rather speak G2980 five words with my understanding, that by my voice I might teach G2727 others also, than ten thousand words in an unknown tongue.
1Co 14:20
Brethren, be not children in understanding: howbeit in malice be ye children, but in understanding be men.
1Co 14:21
In the law it is written, With men of other tongues and other lips will
I speak G2980 unto this people; and yet for all that will they not hear G1522 me, saith the Lord.
1Co 14:22
Wherefore tongues are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe not: but prophesying serveth not for them that believe not, but for them which believe.
1Co 14:23
If therefore the whole church be come together into one place, and
all speak G2980 with tongues, and there come in those that are unlearned, or unbelievers, will they not say that ye are mad?
1Co 14:24
But if all prophesy, and there come in one that believeth not, or one unlearned, he is convinced of all, he is judged of all:
1Co 14:25
And thus are the secrets of his heart made manifest; and so falling down G4098 on his face he will worship God, and report that God is in you of a truth.
1Co 14:26
How is it then, brethren? when ye come together, every one of you hath a psalm, hath a doctrine, hath a tongue, hath a revelation, hath an interpretation. Let all things be done unto edifying.
1Co 14:27
If G1535
any man G5100 speak G2980 in an unknown tongue, let it be by two, or at the most by three, and that by course; and let one interpret. G139
1Co 14:28
But if there be no interpreter, let him keep silence G4601 in the church; and let
him speak G2980 to himself, and to God.
1Co 14:29
Let( G1161 )
the prophets G4396 speak G2980 two G1417 or G2228 three, G5140 and G2532 let the G3588 other G243 judge. G1252
1Co 14:30
If any thing be revealed to another that sitteth by, let the first hold his peace.
1Co 14:31
For ye may all prophesy one by one, that all may learn, and all may be comforted.
1Co 14:32
And the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets.
1Co 14:33
For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints.
—
1Co 14:34
Let your women keep silence G4601 in the churches:
for it is not permitted G2010 unto them to speak; G2980 but they are commanded to be under obedience, G5293 as also saith the law.
1Co 14:35
And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: G3624 for it is a shame for women to speak G2980 in the church.
When I did my word search I was amazed to find that I Cor 14 is one of the most ‘speak’ rich passages in Scripture. The Greek word is a common one, occurring 295 times in the NT, but it was still amazing to find it used 21 times in this chapter prior to verse 34. This Greek word is used more in this chapter than in any other chapter in the New Testament. (The Greek word doesn’t seem to be used at all in the Old Testament. Funny, that.)
So when Paul pulled the word ‘speak’ into this text in verse 34, he was using a word that he had just been using over, and over, and over. One could argue it was the theme of the preceding passage. The way the verb ‘to speak’ was used in that passage was directly referring to speaking:
1) In tongues
2) In prophecy
3) For edification (or not)
And then In the context of verse 26 it was used indirectly to refer to the entire worship of the church: Psalm, tongue, doctrine, revelation, interpretation, edification.
So the verb ‘be silent’ in church is defined by the immediate instruction ‘forbidden to speak’, which I have addressed above. It is important, then, when one goes through the dictionary definitions and commentators speaking on the issue, that we ask ourselves, “When they define ‘silent’, are they using the definition of, ‘The kind of silence where one is not permitted to speak”?
We need to apply the same rule to the examples, to other verses that use these words. When the crowd becomes silent when Paul starts speaking to them in Hebrew (Acts 21:40, 22:2), we understand that that is a ’the kind of silence that happens when one is interested in what someone will say’, not ‘the kind of silence one does when one is not permitted to speak’… since we know full well that they were permitted to speak, indeed they had just been speaking.
When the party of circumcision becomes silent at the end of Paul’s story,(Acts 11:18) we can have no thought that it was because they had been forbidden to speak: because they immediately start praising God! The word ‘silent’ there means that they ‘stopped arguing’.
Many times we hear of people becoming silent because something amazing had happened, because they had been asked a hard question, because something was a secret, because someone wants to talk…
However there are two times in Scripture, outside of the instruction to women, when a verb for being ‘silent’ (one of the two Greek words used in instruction to women) is used in the immediate context of being forbidden to ‘speak’ (the same Greek word used in the instruction to women), and they both are in the same chapter as the instruction to women (I Cor 14). They apply to men:
1) The man who would ‘speak’ in tongues is told to ‘keep silence’ if there is no interpreter present (I Cor 14:27) and
2) The prophet who has just been ‘speaking’ is to ‘hold his peace’ when another prophet rises with a message from God. (I Cor 14:29-30)
These passages are directly parallel to the instruction to women, using both of the same Greek words, and they are very clear: stop or don’t even start talking. The tongue speakers is NOT to give voice to his tongue, and the prophet is to STOP giving voice to his prophecy.
The words used for the women are exactly parallel as that for the speaker of tongues for whom there is no interpreter: they are to be silent in the church, they are not permitted to speak.
Whereas the instruction for the prophet and the speaker in tongues is in the context of their particular gift and setting (there being no interpreter or another speaker); the instruction for women is general: in the church.
Other Context
The idea of ‘silence’ in this passage is further defined by other aspects of the context, including: ‘to be in obedience’, ‘as also says the law’, ‘learn anything’, ‘asking their husband at home’ instead, and the general admonition of ‘shame’.
Let’s hold those in abeyance for a second while we bring forward another of the relevant passages:
1Ti 2:11
Let the woman G1135 learn in silence G2271
with all subjection. G5292
1Ti 2:12
But I suffer not a woman to teach, G1321 nor to usurp authority over G831 the man,
but to be in silence. G2271
1Ti 2:13
For Adam was first formed, then Eve.
1Ti 2:14
And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.
1Ti 2:15
Notwithstanding she shall be saved G4982 in childbearing, G5042 if they continue in faith G4102 and G2532 charity G26 and holiness G38 with sobriety. G4997
From this passage we add to our list of immediate context the ideas of, ‘Adam was formed first’, ‘Adam was not deceived’, ‘the woman being deceived’, ‘with all subjection’, and in direct contrast to teaching and usurping authority over the man.
The Reason in the Context
Another rule that I have for exegesis is this: don’t go looking for reasons in history and culture when there are reasons given right in the Biblical text. Reasons from history and culture may add to those reasons, and shape them, but we should look first to the immediate context.
Three things come to mind from the immediate context as far as reasons. The first is ‘as also says the law’ (ie God has already spoken on this matter, and has not changed His mind.). The second and third are like it, “For Adam was first formed” and “Adam was not in the deception”.
A critical feature of all three of the reasons actually given in the text is that they have nothing to do with the immediate context of either the Corinthian or Ephesian churches. One of them literally refers back to the creation of man and woman, one to the fall, and one to the law.
Those Ephesian Women
Thus when commentators say, “Whatever… quietness means, it must be understood against the backdrop of the Ephesian women…” I must emphatically disagree. Whatever it means it must be first read in the immediate context of ‘as also says the law’, ‘Adam was formed first’, ‘Adam was not in the deception’, and the repeated emphasis on authority, obedience, and subjection particularly that of the wife to her husband. This text says nothing at all about ‘those Ephesian women’, but it gives multiple other reasons for its instruction, including one creation ordinance.
(I find it especially interesting that he would bring up the busybody young women of I Timothy 5, as the instruction there is very clearly stated: not that they would ‘have a quiet demeanor’ in church, but that they get married!)
Authority
Instead they all have to do with authority, particularly teaching authority. I would be very interested in seeing someone make the case, “All women should have a quiet demeanor because Adam was formed first.” However the Scriptures make the case clearly, right from the creation, that Adam was in authority over Eve. He named her.
Nor does a ‘quiet demeanor’ seem to have much to do with the issue of the woman having been deceived in the fall. However the issue of being deceived would very directly relate to a prohibition on teaching and having authority.
And one would search the law in vain for a general command to women to have a ‘quiet demeanor’ when they taught in the temple. It would be much easier to find passages which illustrated that they were not to be teaching in the temple at all.
So one overarching theme that we see in these verses is a concern for authority, particularly teaching authority. We see a similar theme in I Cor 11:
1Co 11:1 Be ye followers of me, even as I also am of Christ.
1Co 11:2 Now I praise you, brethren, that ye remember me in all things, and keep the ordinances, as I delivered them to you.
1Co 11:3 But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.
1Co 11:4 Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head.
1Co 11:5 But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.
1Co 11:6 For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.
1Co 11:7 For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man.
1Co 11:8 For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man.
1Co 11:9 Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.
1Co 11:10 For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the angels.
1Co 11:11 Nevertheless neither is the man without the woman, neither the woman without the man, in the Lord.
1Co 11:12 For as the woman is of the man, even so is the man also by the woman; but all things of God.
1Co 11:13 Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered?
1Co 11:14 Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?
1Co 11:15 But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering.
1Co 11:16 But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God.These passages teach that the woman is to remain covered in worship as a reflection of the authority she is under. Her position was that she was created for the man. As the head of man is Christ, and the head of Christ is God, so is the head of the woman the man.
And in I Peter 3 we read:
1Pe 3:1 Likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands; that, if any obey not the word, they also may without the word be won by the conversation of the wives;
1Pe 3:2 While they behold your chaste conversation coupled with fear.
1Pe 3:3 Whose adorning let it not be that outward adorning of plaiting the hair, and of wearing of gold, or of putting on of apparel;
1Pe 3:4 But let it be the hidden man of the heart, in that which is not corruptible, even the ornament of a meek and quiet spirit, which is in the sight of God of great price.
1Pe 3:5 For after this manner in the old time the holy women also, who trusted in God, adorned themselves, being in subjection unto their own husbands:
1Pe 3:6 Even as Sara obeyed Abraham, calling him lord: whose daughters ye are, as long as ye do well, and are not afraid with any amazement.Again the idea of subjection is related to the idea of ‘without a word’. And the idea of authority is taken to the level of calling her husband ‘Lord’, a word in Greek used for God Himself.
Shame
It is seen as a shame both for women to speak in church and for them to worship (literally: to pray or prophecy) with their head uncovered. The only other place this Greek word seems to be used is in the context of speaking of the unfruitful words of darkness:
Eph 5:11 And G2532 have no fellowship G4790 G3361 with the G3588 unfruitful G175 works G2041 of darkness, G4655 but G1161 rather G3123 ( G2532 ) reprove G1651 them.
Eph 5:12 For G1063 it is G2076 a shame G149 even G2532 to speak G3004 of those things which are done G1096 of G5259 them G846 in secret. G2931 Summary
The linguistic form of these passages means that all of the texts surrounding the command to be silent can appropriately be read both as a modifier of the command to be silent, and as reasons for the command. This is normally true of a reason: it helps define the activity it promotes. When one ‘cuts a board’ to make a cabinet, that helps define the type of cut; as compared, for example, to when one ‘cuts down’ a tree to get it out of one’s garden. One would be very careful and straight when making the cabinet cut, using a table saw, for example; whereas one might use an axe and be pretty haphazard when cutting down the tree in the garden.
One way to help us see this is for us to change the linguistic form of the verses in order to focus on each of the separate parts of the text, in their ‘modifier’ and their ‘reason’ aspects.
Thus:
The kind of silence that women are to engage in at church:
The kind of silence that one engages in when one is not permitted to speak. (I Cor 14:34)
The kind of silence that one engages in when one is under obedience. (I Cor 14:34)
The kind of silence that one engages in when one is told to be silent (or to be obedient) in the law. (I Cor 14:34)
The kind of silence that one engages in when it is a shame for one to speak in church. (I Cor 14:35)
The kind of silence that one engages in when, if one were to wish to ask a question, one is supposed to ask one’s husband and home. (I Cor 14:35)
—
The kind of silence that one engages in when one is behaving ‘with all subjection’. (I Tim 2:11)
The kind of silence that one engages in when one is not to teach (the man). (I Tim 2:12)
The kind of silence that one engages in when one is not to usurp authority over the man. (I Tim 2:12)
The kind of silence that one engages in when one is a member of a sex that was created second. (I Tim 2:13)
The kind of silence that one engages in when one is a member of a sex that was deceived in the fall. (I Tim 2:14)
—
Their silence is linguistically parallel to two situations involving men:
One where someone with the gift of tongues is to be silent if there is no interpreter present (speaking instead to himself and God).
One where a prophet is to be silent if another prophet receives a revelation while the first is speaking.
Women are to be silent in church because: (See references above)
They are to be silent because they are not permitted to speak.
They are to be silent because they are under obedience.
They are to be silent because the law also tells them to be silent. (Or to be obedient)
They are to be silent because it is a shame for them to speak.
They are to be silent because if they wish to ask a question, they are supposed to ask their husband at home.
—
They are to be silent because they are to behave ‘with all subjection’.
They are to be silent because they are not to teach (the man).
They are to be silent because they are not to usurp authority over the man.
They are to be silent because they are a member of a sex that was created second.
They are to be silent because they are a member of a sex that was deceived in the fall.
Another way to look at the passage would be to go from the core aspects to the less relevant:
1) That our worship services are to be in order, they are to follow the Biblical commands, they are not to proceed in a shameful fashion, and that part of this involves the women being silent (and covered). And in direct contrast, the men are NOT called to be silent. (In general. Two very specific exceptions are given.)
2) That the core issue in her silence is her subjection/submission/obedience, in particular to her husband.
3) The core ‘silence’ she is to observe is a prohibition on anything where it might be thought that she was exercising authority over her husband:
-Teaching, preaching, prophesying, speaking in tongues, exhorting, etc.
4) All of the parts of the (actual) worship service are included by implication: bringing a Psalm, tongue, doctrine, revelation, interpretation, edification.
5) Also part of the core is her asking questions in church, or of a man not her husband. Her husband’s teaching role with his own family is supported by his doing the teaching of his own wife in his own house.
6) This teaching is not related to some particular problems in the NT church, as the doctrinal context is the creation of Adam, the deception of Eve, and was previously taught in the Law.
7) These (and other verses) raise particularly the issue of the woman being deceived, thus again emphasizing both a denial of her role in authoritative teaching, and her need to ask her husband at home.
—
8) The speaking that is least covered by those passages would be those where she was operating under authority, particularly that of her husband, and those where no authority would be presumed.
9) Other passages make it very clear that speaking outside the church, particularly speaking to other women, especially younger women, and her own children, is not included in this prohibition. Nor is it denied that women will receive wisdom and prophecy from God… just that that is not exercised authoritatively over her husband, nor in church.
Conclusion
As I said above, this post was not written specifically as a post. I hope and pray it will serve as a helpful reference for discussions on this subject.
A very thorough article, and I have also developed and employed the same rules of interpretation that you have applied, arriving at the same conclusion[s] on this matter. In other words, you have saved me considerable labor, as I can now simply refer to this and add minimally, if at all. However, I must still engage with alternative methods or interpretations, even though the interpretation here seems to me quite evident or at least sound. Afterward, I shall either supplement or correct things with another comment, that is: try to do so, or I will still fully agree with you. In either case, I shall share this article at that point, but I have already given it a heart.
I wish you God's blessing,
Justus.