Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Von's avatar

Someone commented on immigration. Immigration does not change the calculus here, it just shifts its focus. If a colony were to start with 10,000 people and do well, but have a birth rated of 2.2 (ie static), it would not help to say 'immigration'. That immigration would have to come from somewhere, and those people would have to be producing enough for themsleves AND to support the new colony.

And it is almost provably mathematically impossible for a space colony to truly grow via immigration. The difficulty of walking from Venezuala to the US would pale in comparison to having to travel to another STAR! Spaceships almost by definition have to be small. There is no way for them to handle the billions of people needed for even one colony, let alone several.

Expand full comment
Michael DiBaggio's avatar

The prevalence of sci-fi and fantasy stories which are just The Current Year But With Spaceships/Dragons is dismaying. It indicates both a collapse of creativity and a decrease in intellect. Population dynamics is something that even popular franchises do not understand at all. Take, for instance, the size of militaries quoted for supposedly highly militaristic evil empires embroiled in galaxy-spanning war. One Star Wars book said the Empire had 10,000 Star Destroyers (read: capital ships) at its height, which is much less than one per inhabited star system. An entry in an old Warhammer 40,000 Codex describes a particular planet as having a planetary defense force of "8 million men...as well defended as any in the Imperium." Really?! Who knew that the Galactic Empire and the Imperium of Man were decidedly under-militarized compared to present-day Sweden.

Expand full comment
23 more comments...

No posts