Discussion about this post

User's avatar
maryh10000's avatar

Wow. I did some research too, and most of the meanings are negative. They mean giving up something that you shouldn't give up, or that could put you in danger. And no, the leader, and in the moral sense, no one, should do that. The closest meaning to what I said is "mutual concessions", or "intermediate" or "blending two things." Those could be value neutral.

I wonder whether it's acquired the meaning "bad faith" for a lot of people, who have been forced to compromise things they shouldn't have had to. Is this another word ruined by our culture wars? And saying you "won't compromise" in marriage does make the person not compromising sound like an autocrat or a dictator.

Expand full comment
maryh10000's avatar

We have a different definition of "compromise" then, I guess. It appears your definition means "to choose the inferior option to make the other person happy," or "to sacrifice morality or goals or leadership to make the other person happy." I can see why you might look at it that way. That certainly is often part of the way compromise is used in the modern world.

To me, it simply means transparently sacrificing something you want for the good of the other or the relationship.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts