6 Comments

Hi. I will be brief. I think methodological naturalism is a bit silly but I understand the intent. I don’t condone it. Keep the overton window maximally open and the truth will reveal itself. However i get we don’t want to go down certain rabbit holes. I believe you are real but you could not be. I can never prove it but we will hopefully both operate as if we are. And if we reach a hurdle where there isn’t sufficient evidence, we will just have out best logic and reasoning to rely on. Nothing is ever truly certain. The Scientific method demands to be challenged, that’s what makes it science. If you start out saying we won’t consider this. You have already lost the plot.

Expand full comment
author

OK, great. I don't know how much time I will have today, but I will let you know when I have my next post ready to go.

Expand full comment

Hey Von, is their more info then your post above somewhere? I will be working tomorrow but will chime in as able. Do you have any questions or specifics you want to go over? Can you provide a link here to the thing tomorrow or tell me where specifically?

Expand full comment
author

When my post goes live in a couple hours (about three) I will post a link here, and it will tag you, so I will make sure that you see it :) No problem not responding immediately.

Expand full comment

Thanks brother. Can’t wait.

Expand full comment