The materialist theory of history, that all politics and ethics are the expression of economics, is a very simple fallacy indeed. It consists simply of confusing the necessary conditions of life with the normal preoccupations of life, that are quite a different thing. It is like saying that because a man can only walk about on two legs, therefore he never walks about except to buy shoes and stockings. Man cannot live without the two props of food and drink, which support him like two legs; but to suggest that they have been the motives of all his movements in history is like saying that the goal of all his military marches or religious pilgrimages must have been the Golden Leg of Miss Kilmansegg or the ideal and perfect leg of Sir Willoughby Patterne. But it is such movements that make up the story of mankind, and without them there would practically be no story at all. Cows may be purely economic, in the sense that we cannot see that they do much beyond grazing and seeking better grazing-grounds; and that is why a history of cows in twelve volumes would not be very lively reading. Sheep and goats may be pure economists in their external action at least; but that is why the sheep has hardly been a hero of epic wars and empires thought worthy of detailed narration; and even the more active quadruped has not inspired a book for boys called Golden Deeds of Gallant Goats or any similar title. But so far from the movements that make up the story of man being economic, we may say that the story only begins where the motive{155} of the cows and sheep leaves off. It will be hard to maintain that the Crusaders went from their homes into a howling wilderness because cows go from a wilderness to a more comfortable grazing-ground. It will be hard to maintain that the Arctic explorers went north with the same material motive that made the swallows go south. And if you leave things like all the religious wars and all the merely adventurous explorations out of the human story, it will not only cease to be human at all but cease to be a story at all. The outline of history is made of these decisive curves and angles determined by the will of man. Economic history would not even be history.
I'm not sure I would go quite that far, but it does obviously leave out several hugely important things. I don't think he had 'a good relationship with God' in his list :)
My comment was a little tongue-in-cheek. I am quite sure Maslow was uninterested in “self-actualization from a biblical worldview sort of way. It is not the great beacon it once was.
But they desire cattle and chattel for they are easier to count.
You mean Mazlow’s Hierarchy of Needs is a fiction? But it is accepted everywhere!!
I'm not sure I would go quite that far, but it does obviously leave out several hugely important things. I don't think he had 'a good relationship with God' in his list :)
My comment was a little tongue-in-cheek. I am quite sure Maslow was uninterested in “self-actualization from a biblical worldview sort of way. It is not the great beacon it once was.